1. Unified risk register
Bring together description, source, context, category, owner, causes, consequences, controls, evidence, and links to events, changes, and audits.
Risk Management — Roadmap
RoadmapQSigma360 is working toward a unified enterprise risk register that connects each risk to its context, owner, controls, treatment actions, and review dates. The vision helps organizations move beyond isolated spreadsheets and unexplained scores toward assessments whose logic can be understood, tracked over time, and connected to accountable work.
Risk elements exist today within HACCP, Change Control, selected quality records, and Supplier Quality. A unified enterprise register, standardized matrices, and full risk dashboards are not complete as an independent module and remain on the roadmap.

A red cell or high number does not explain priority. Teams need the assessment factors, matrix version, controls, acceptance authority, and residual exposure. The future QSigma360 experience will make this chain visible so treatment, escalation, and review follow an approved method.
Bring together description, source, context, category, owner, causes, consequences, controls, evidence, and links to events, changes, and audits.
Define severity, likelihood, detectability, or a qualitative method, with visible formulas, interpretations, and acceptance ranges.
Distinguish exposure before and after controls while retaining the matrix version so historical assessments do not silently change.
Link actions, owners, dates, resources, evidence, and verification methods, then reassess residual risk.
Trigger reviews by level or event, escalate risks above limits, and require policy-defined authority for acceptance.
Show top and overdue risks, category distribution, movement from inherent to residual risk, and control effectiveness after validation.
The target module is designed to connect with HACCP, Supplier Quality, NCR, CAPA, Audits, Change Control, Documents, and Reports. A hazard assessment inside HACCP is not automatically the same as an enterprise risk record; each context retains its approved method and permissions. AI may suggest risks, factors, or treatments for review, but it cannot approve a score, accept a risk, or implement a treatment automatically.
Illustrative view — no customer data
A score without context cannot support a sound decision
Target capabilities
Target workflow
Enterprise integration without confusing contexts
No. Risk capabilities exist inside current modules, but the unified enterprise register, matrices, and complete dashboards remain on the roadmap.
The vision supports configurable, versioned, and approved methods with visible factors and interpretations rather than a number without explanation.
Inherent risk represents exposure before controls; residual risk represents exposure after those controls. Comparing them shows treatment impact and supports acceptance or escalation.
No. AI can produce reviewable suggestions only. Assessment, acceptance, and escalation remain the responsibility of authorized people.
Share your methodology, categories, and acceptance thresholds with QSigma360, and explore the platform capabilities available today.
Start with a tailored demo built around your organization’s needs.