QSigma360

A clear response to every quality signal

Available

Capture every quality signal, contain its impact, and turn it into traceable investigation and action

QSigma360 brings nonconformances and complaints into a common quality-event framework while preserving the purpose and lifecycle of each record. From intake through containment, investigation, and resolution, teams can see what has been completed, what remains due, and whether escalation to CAPA is appropriate.

Multiple quality signals being captured, contained, investigated, and resolved

Do not let a signal disappear between channels

An issue may begin as an internal observation, an inspection result, a customer complaint, or a pattern across multiple records. When every channel is managed separately, prioritization, evidence gathering, and pattern recognition become difficult. QSigma360 brings intake, assessment, containment, investigation, and follow-up into one reviewable context.

A complaint remains focused on customer experience, communication, and resolution. A nonconformance remains focused on failure to meet a requirement and control of its impact. The records can be linked, and either can escalate to CAPA when risk, recurrence, or the depth of the cause warrants broader action.

Capabilities from intake to closure

1. Multi-source event intake

Record quality events from operations, customers, suppliers, audits, inspections, and other sources, together with origin details, attachments, and initial context.

2. Consistent classification and priority

Set event type, category, severity, risk, and priority, then route the record to the appropriate owner under approved permissions and workflow.

3. Immediate-impact containment

Document what was done to protect the customer, product, or process, including initial correction and decisions affecting related material or records.

4. Investigation and cause analysis

Collect evidence, questions, and observations, and apply available root-cause methods when needed rather than addressing only the visible symptom.

5. Resolution and communication follow-up

Coordinate responses, actions, due dates, and relevant updates while keeping external communication subject to human review and sending.

6. Connected escalation and trends

Link similar cases, identify recurrence, initiate CAPA when required, and monitor trends without losing the path back to source records and evidence.

How a case is handled

  1. 1Capture: Record the event, source, description, and initial evidence.
  2. 2Triage: Determine record type, severity, risk, priority, and ownership.
  3. 3Contain: Take immediate action to protect the product, customer, or process.
  4. 4Investigate: Review evidence, analyze causes, and define the extent of impact.
  5. 5Resolve or escalate: Complete correction and actions, or initiate CAPA when appropriate.
  6. 6Verify and close: Review evidence and outcomes before closure, then monitor trends.

A common framework with record-level governance

Complaints and nonconformances can connect with CAPA, audits, suppliers, food safety, documents, and reports, while permissions protect the confidentiality of each case. The AI Quality Copilot may suggest investigation questions, improve a description, or draft a response. It does not send customer communication, change the official record, approve a decision, or close a case without human review.

Illustrative view — no customer data

A simplified view of the workflow

Safe illustrative content
1

Do not let a signal disappear between channels

2

Capabilities from intake to closure

3

How a case is handled

4

A common framework with record-level governance

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a complaint and a nonconformance?

A complaint records feedback or dissatisfaction from a customer or consumer and the response process. A nonconformance records failure to meet a specified requirement and documents control, investigation, and disposition.

Can a complaint be linked to a nonconformance or CAPA?

Yes. Each record can retain its own lifecycle while appropriate links preserve a clear path from the original signal to investigation and action without duplicating context.

When should a case escalate to CAPA?

That depends on the organization’s methodology. Severity, risk, recurrence, systemic impact, and investigation findings may inform the decision. The platform does not replace authorized technical judgment.

Can AI reply to the customer or close the case?

No. AI may provide a reviewable suggestion or draft, but external communication, approval, and closure remain permission-controlled human actions.

Turn every complaint or nonconformance into a clear improvement path

See how QSigma360 helps your team capture, contain, investigate, and connect each event to the appropriate action without losing evidence or accountability.

Start with a tailored demo built around your organization’s needs.