1. Connected sources and triggers
Initiate CAPA from relevant quality events while retaining a clear path to the source, risk context, evidence, and decision that justified escalation.
Actions that address cause and prove results
AvailableMove from root cause to proven effectiveness—not just administrative closure
QSigma360 structures the CAPA lifecycle from source and investigation through action planning, implementation, and effectiveness verification. Evidence, ownership, due dates, and decisions remain connected to the originating record so teams can demonstrate what changed, why it changed, and whether recurrence risk was meaningfully addressed.
Close the cause, not only the task
Actions can be completed on time while the problem remains likely to recur, especially when investigation is shallow or effectiveness criteria are unclear. QSigma360 helps distinguish immediate correction from corrective or preventive action, and connects every action with a defined cause, owner, due date, evidence requirement, and intended outcome.
Rather than becoming an isolated file, CAPA retains its relationship to the complaint, nonconformance, audit finding, supplier event, or food safety event that triggered it. Reviewers can understand the context, follow implementation, and make an evidence-based decision to close or reopen the record.
Capabilities from trigger to effectiveness
2. Investigation and root-cause analysis
Structure the investigation and use 5 Whys or Fishbone where appropriate, connecting hypotheses and conclusions with evidence rather than selecting a generic cause.
3. Actionable plans
Convert findings into scoped actions with an owner, due date, priority, and required outcome while distinguishing correction, corrective action, and preventive action.
4. Dependencies, due dates, and escalation
Track relationships between actions, overdue work, and accountability so a dependent step is not treated as complete before its prerequisites are addressed.
5. Implementation evidence and review
Attach proof of implementation and retain material comments, reviews, and decisions in a history that connects the plan with the outcome.
6. Effectiveness review and reopening
Define the measurement method, review date, and acceptance criteria, then document results and lessons or reopen CAPA when effectiveness is not demonstrated.
How the CAPA lifecycle works
- 1Trigger: Connect CAPA to the event, risk, and rationale for systemic action.
- 2Investigate: Define the problem extent, gather evidence, and identify root cause.
- 3Plan: Select actions, assign owners and due dates, and define success criteria.
- 4Implement: Complete actions, capture evidence, and address delay or dependency.
- 5Verify effectiveness: Measure results after an appropriate period against agreed criteria.
- 6Close or reopen: Approve the outcome or initiate further treatment and record lessons learned.
Connected CAPA with accountable governance
CAPA can connect with complaints, nonconformances, audits, suppliers, HACCP, change control, documents, and reporting. Permissions govern who investigates, implements, reviews, or approves, while decisions remain traceable. The AI Quality Copilot may suggest investigation questions, draft 5 Whys or Fishbone content, propose action wording, or support an effectiveness review. Its output does not change the official record, approve an action, or close CAPA automatically.
Illustrative view — no customer data
A simplified view of the workflow
1
Close the cause, not only the task
2
Capabilities from trigger to effectiveness
3
How the CAPA lifecycle works
4
Connected CAPA with accountable governance
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between correction, corrective action, and preventive action?
Correction addresses the immediate observed condition. Corrective action addresses the cause of a detected nonconformance to prevent recurrence. Preventive action addresses a potential cause before an event occurs, under the organization’s methodology.
Does every nonconformance require CAPA?
Not necessarily. Escalation depends on severity, risk, recurrence, systemic impact, investigation findings, and organizational criteria. QSigma360 documents the decision but does not replace technical judgment.
How is CAPA effectiveness verified?
The team defines an acceptance criterion, measurement method, and suitable review date, then evaluates the evidence and result. If the criterion is not met, CAPA can be reopened or further treatment documented.
What role does AI play in CAPA?
AI provides reviewable suggestions for investigation, cause analysis, action drafting, and effectiveness review. It does not approve, sign, apply a change, or close the record for the user.
Make CAPA effectiveness demonstrable
See how QSigma360 connects root cause with action planning, implementation evidence, and effectiveness verification without losing context or accountability.